Pros & Cons of Wax Free Gasket versus Wax Gasket on Toilet Installation

Users who are viewing this thread

herbolaryo

New Member
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
San Francisco
fluidmaster_on_toilet.jpg


What are the Pros and COns of Using the Wax Free Gasket versus the ordinary Wax Gasket on Toilet?

Are there situation where you can't use Wax Free gasket?

fluidmaster-betterthanwax.jpg


Sometimes the Better Than Wax is not the right sizing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dunbar Plumbing

Master Plumber
Messages
2,922
Reaction score
10
Points
0
Location
Northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati Area
Website
www.KoldBreeze.com
I prefer wax over the wax-free.

When you install/replace a toilet, it should be a permanent scenario.

From a service perspective, I've been the lucky guy to financially prosper from horned wax rings or those new fluidmaster waxless adaptors that jar loose during install, and leak.

I've heard some of those waxless work but I go with what works for me and from the guidelines of liability.
 

Terry

The Plumbing Wizard
Staff member
Messages
29,939
Reaction score
3,402
Points
113
Location
Bothell, Washington
Website
terrylove.com
If I use the waxless by Fluidmaster, I push it on the bottom of the bowl.
Sometimes if the flange is low, it can be a good way to go.
Doing it that way, it seems to work.

If I use wax, I set it on the flange.
This works too.
If the flange is higher than the finished flooring, then a single wax on the closet flange works.
If the flange is lower than the finished flooring, I stack two wax rings. A regular wax down first, and then a wax with horn over that. The toilet then sets down over that and compresses the wax.

Note: I always check to see if the bowl needs shimming before I put the wax down. I set the bowl down and see if it rocks. If it does rock, I might place two shims at the back, pinning the front of the bowl down to the floor. I then lift up the bowl, drop the wax(s) down, and then set the bowl down again.,

oatey-twist-n-set-terrylove-3.jpg


Since this flange was above the flooring, one wax ring worked.

 
Last edited:

hj

Master Plumber
Messages
33,540
Reaction score
990
Points
113
Location
Cave Creek, Arizona
Website
www.terrylove.com
waxless

I have only used a couple of waxless rings. The main problem is you almost have to have second person to ensure you are setting it down exactly over the hole and straight down or the adapter can be dislodged.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,760
Reaction score
1,178
Points
113
Location
New England
If for some reason you find yourself pulling your toilet to clear debris (toys, etc.), not having to replace the wax seal can be a time saver - no wax cleanup, and you don't have to have a new seal on hand each time. It also compensates for an improperly or less than ideal installation of the flange since it has a built-in horn to direct the waste to the drain. So, instead of having to use multiple wax rings, you only need the waxless seal.
 

Gary Swart

In the Trades
Messages
8,101
Reaction score
82
Points
48
Location
Yakima, WA
As I think back over posts from the past on this, it seems to me that it's largely a matter of personal choice. I'm sure many pros stay with the wax rings because that's what they have become accustom to, they know they will work, they don't mind (too much anyway) the messy clean up when they have to pull the toilet up. That said, there are also a number of pros that use the waxless rings at least sometimes, also with good success. The waxless rings are widely used, and they seem to be trouble free. Use what you feel good about. Terry's tip about attaching the waxless to the toilet rather than trying to set the toilet on the ring as the directions with the ring suggest, is a good one.
 

commoner

New Member
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Texas
Terry said:

"If I use the waxless by Fluidmaster, I push it on the bottom of the bowl.
Sometimes if the flange is low, it can b"

Terry, how do you attach the gasket to the bottom of the bowl if it just has a rubber seal?
 

Seasoned Warrior

New Member
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Mendocino Coast of California
Waxless, yes!

I've been using the waxless for a couple of years now in the apartments I own and manage. Last year I started to replace all the standard toilets with low-flush models because water has become one of our greatest costs. I find that the waxless are a quick easy way to install and after about 30 toilets I ahve yet to have one fail which is better than I got with wax rings. One fo the problems I have is with reliable help. In my area anyone with a pick-up truck is a handyman but few have any real skills. So while I can get help with some work I take care of the critical stuff myself.
 

Jimbo

Plumber
Messages
8,918
Reaction score
16
Points
0
Location
San Diego, CA
pros: Will make up for at least a couple of inches of flange-too-low. It is much preferred in this application to multiple wax rings. It is quicker that stacking up flange extenders.
It will tolerate a flange that is not perfectly level with respect to the finished floor.

cons: they cost more. Install can be tricky. I prefer Terry's method over the Fluidmaster instructions to use that hoaky little cardboard spacer.
They have not been around long enough to know what the longevity of those fat rubber rings will be.
 

Turbocruiser

New Member
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Colorado USA
Fine folks, I'd like to bump this thread and ask about something somewhat separate in regards to the regular wax ring vs. "wax free ring" debate. I was just watching DIY Network and they were instructing on installing tile floors that have radiant heat wires within the flooring ( btwn the tile backer board and the tile). It just so happens that they were using the same system I recently installed in my tile floors (Suntouch).

One thing they mentioned is it is important to use the "wax-free ring systems" (they happened to show the Fluidmaster version) with heated flooring to prevent the heat from the floor melting the regular wax rings. I had never heard that before and would like to get some advice about this from the experts.

Right now my upstairs toilet is installed with an extra thick regular wax ring with rubber flange reinforcement (to compensate for the thickness of the tile floor vs. the laminate floor that was there previously) and my downstairs toilet is yet to be installed. I was just getting ready to install the downstairs toilet when I saw this show on DIY. Thanks in advance for any and all advice.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,760
Reaction score
1,178
Points
113
Location
New England
It's unlikely to be a problem unless you were really careless with your heat mat install or you let the floor get insanely hot. Since an un-airconditioned house could get into the low 100's and the wax seal doesn't fail...your floor shouldn't get that hot with the heat, I'd say it is irrelevant. Now, if you were using hot water, or the heating elements were touching it, maybe. Most of the time, the heating mat is not run under the toilet, and no floor should be hotter than body temp (and a lot generally lower), I don't see it as a problem.
 

Ballvalve

General Engineering Contractor
Messages
3,569
Reaction score
42
Points
48
Location
northfork, california
I have done many radiants and they all got wax rings, no issues. Only issue is if installer is stupid enough to take the manifold outlet for that zone into the bath and wrap it right around the flange area a few times. Just outside the footprint causes no issues I can see.
 

Turbocruiser

New Member
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Colorado USA
I'm going to come up with a fix to all of this. It'll be on youtube soon enough. We as a world of technology can certainly do better than this traditional design of connecting a water closet to a plumbing system.

It's long overdue.

Not trying to pester this but any update at this time? Thanks.
 

Neromancer

New Member
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Ontario, Canada
Fine folks, I'd like to bump this thread and ask about something somewhat separate in regards to the regular wax ring vs. "wax free ring" debate. I was just watching DIY Network and they were instructing on installing tile floors that have radiant heat wires within the flooring ( btwn the tile backer board and the tile). It just so happens that they were using the same system I recently installed in my tile floors (Suntouch).

One thing they mentioned is it is important to use the "wax-free ring systems" (they happened to show the Fluidmaster version) with heated flooring to prevent the heat from the floor melting the regular wax rings. I had never heard that before and would like to get some advice about this from the experts.

Right now my upstairs toilet is installed with an extra thick regular wax ring with rubber flange reinforcement (to compensate for the thickness of the tile floor vs. the laminate floor that was there previously) and my downstairs toilet is yet to be installed. I was just getting ready to install the downstairs toilet when I saw this show on DIY. Thanks in advance for any and all advice.

I work for a heating cable manufacturer (EasyHeat). It's a competitor to Suntouch. We recommend that the heating cables when installed stay at least 6" away from the toilet flange. This way there is no danger to the wax sealing ring as little heat will conduct that far. www.warmtiles.com
 
Last edited:

Louie101

New Member
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Florida
Will the fluidmaster wax fee gasket work on an 4x3 offset (2") toilet flange? Thank you in advance.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,760
Reaction score
1,178
Points
113
Location
New England
The waxfree seals work by a funnel with a big o-ring on it to provide the seal against the sides of the pipe. I don't think there'd be any place for it to seal in a curved offset flange. Stick with wax.
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks