Midway through a bathroom remodel in my 1904 Southern Colonial 2-story, I have decided upon a Toto toilet based on overwhelming consensus on the forums. However, having now seen these toilets in person at a local Toto supplier, I am most interested in the Clayton. The Dartmouth would be a 2nd choice, while the Drake (appealingly priced as it may be) is simply too "plain" looking to fit this house.
I was nearly set to purchase the Clayton when, having perused this site, I notice that in Terry's reviews notes he puts a "900" rating in both the Drake and Dartmouth reviews, and yet in the Baldwin (Clayton) review the number is a mere 675.
What gives with that? My understanding is that if the toilet was a GMax-equipped Toto, then the performance should be identical. Am I correct in saying that the Drake and Dartmouth disposed of 900g of waste, whilst the Clayton managed just 675g? This seems a non-negligible difference.
Are the Dartmouth/Drakes toilets simply better-performing than the Clayton, and thus more worthy of my consideration? Or is the Clayton identical in performance and i'm must misreading/misinterpreting Terry's notes?
Perhaps the Baldwin (when it was a Baldwin) was 675, but when its name changed to the Clayton it got improved to be a 900?
Any advice/suggestions/clarifications on this?
Thanks very much,
Supra92
TOTO Clayton
I was nearly set to purchase the Clayton when, having perused this site, I notice that in Terry's reviews notes he puts a "900" rating in both the Drake and Dartmouth reviews, and yet in the Baldwin (Clayton) review the number is a mere 675.
What gives with that? My understanding is that if the toilet was a GMax-equipped Toto, then the performance should be identical. Am I correct in saying that the Drake and Dartmouth disposed of 900g of waste, whilst the Clayton managed just 675g? This seems a non-negligible difference.
Are the Dartmouth/Drakes toilets simply better-performing than the Clayton, and thus more worthy of my consideration? Or is the Clayton identical in performance and i'm must misreading/misinterpreting Terry's notes?
Perhaps the Baldwin (when it was a Baldwin) was 675, but when its name changed to the Clayton it got improved to be a 900?
Any advice/suggestions/clarifications on this?
Thanks very much,
Supra92
TOTO Clayton
Last edited by a moderator: