250.104A
We have enforced that for years. There is often NO continuity between the cold and hot water pipes therefore the system is not bonded if there is no continuity.
For years this has been enforced by others and myself. It is simply common sense. If there is no continuity between the hot and cold piping due to the type of water heater installed, especially with a lack of a mixing valve then in order to bond the metal water piping system, you must provide a jumper between the hot and the cold.
I think you will find yourself out in left field on this one. Having been an inspector for years, and IAEI and NFPA member and having access to panel members who are responsible for changes in the code, I have been able to verify the intent of issues like this.
Some times you just have to admit that you are wrong and eat a piece of humble pie. I am not always correct and I learn something new every single day. The more that I learn, the more I realize just how much I don't know. This issue was resolved years ago and is something that all of us are fully aware of.
Now you are aware of it and can learn from it. Eat the humble pie. I have already and will eat more soon. Just not on this issue.
Having been an inspector and electrical inspector instructor certified by the state of NC for years a and having been directly involved with the members of the IAEI and being the coauthor of the Instructor’s Manual for Electrical Inspectors for the state of North Carolina I don’t think that I have to admit anything because there is no requirement to make a metal water electrically continuous and hasn’t been since the 1984 edition of the NEC.
Just because you and your comrades in arms has been enforcing something means nothing more than you and your comrades in arms are not enforcing the letter of the NEC. Once again I ask you for clear statements quoted from the NEC that requires me to bond the potable water system twice or to make it electrically continuous. I am not asking you for what you think is common sense but clear verbiage from the NEC that requires this silly installation.
5-235 Log #1834 NEC-P05 Final Action: Reject
(250.104(A)(1))
____________________________________________________________
Submitter: Mark T. Rochon, Mark J. Rochon Master Electrician
Recommendation: Revise as follows:
General Combination metal water piping system(s) separated by nonmetallic water piping system(s) where may become energized installed in or attached to a building or structure shall be bonded to the service equipment enclosure, the grounded conductor at the service, the grounding electrode conductor where of sufficient size, or the one or more grounding electrodes used.
Substantiation: Nonmetallic water piping systems are being inserted between our metal water piping system and today’s code is not recognizing these changes.
Panel Meeting Action: Reject
Panel Statement: The conditions indicated in the substantiation are already covered by 250.104(B) where there is not a complete metallic water piping system
Number Eligible to Vote: 15
Ballot Results: Affirmative: 15
____________________________________________________________
5-236 Log #2432 NEC-P05 Final Action: Reject
(250.104(A)(1))
____________________________________________________________
Submitter: Robert P. McGann, City of Cambridge
Recommendation: Revise text to read as follows:
Metal water piping system(s) that is likely to be energized , installed in or attached to a building or structure shall be bonded.
Substantiation: With much expanded use of plastic water piping system(s) isolating section of metal piping systems. This type of installation leaves contractors and inspectors what is required to be bonded.
Panel Meeting Action: Reject
Panel Statement: The requirements of 250.104(A) apply to complete metallic water piping systems. Where there is no complete metallic water piping system, then the requirements of 250.104(B) would apply for those portions of isolated metal water piping system likely to become energized.
Number Eligible to Vote: 15
Ballot Results: Affirmative: 15
As can be seen in these two proposals Code Making Panel 5 makes the statement very clear that continuity of a metal water pipe is not important.
I personally know several members of CMP 5 and have broke bread with them on many occasions. I have worked side by side with a couple of these real smart men.
Tomorrow I will spend all day fulfilling some of the responsibility I have being a member of second committee down on
this page.

Pay close attention to some of the names on this education committee.
You can keep enforcing something that was removed from the codes 25 years ago if you like and the people in your area allows you to do so

but here in the great state of North Carolina we have a real good education program where we insure that our inspectors only enforce the code as it is written and not what they think makes common sense.
Edited to add:
Here is where all this bull crap of bonding the hot and cold came from. In this code cycle the green screw of a receptacle could be attached to a metal water pipe to ensure there was a fault path back to the source in order to operate the overcurrent device.
The CMP realized that the plumbing codes would allow a nonmetallic repair to the metal water pipes so this requirement was removed from the electrical code.
I am still awaiting your post showing where todays code requires the potable water to be electrically continuous.