Thanks for clarifying that. I'm just now wrapping my head around the HDPE pipe sizes and dimension ratios but I think I've got a handle on it and the somewhat confusing aspect of it is that IPS can be either SDR, or SIDR so I think it's fair to say that IPS is not interchangeable with SDR. However, there is no such thing as SIDR CTS, so it does make sense to think of SIDR HDPE pipe as a thing unto itself, especially because it flies in the convention of having a consistent O.D. typical of IPS. I've seen inside-diameter controlled 2" IPS HDPE pipe in SIDR-7, O.D. 2.681 (200psi), and SIDR-9, O.D. 2.545 (160psi). If there were such a thing as you suggest, Wayne, 2" IPS SIDR where the I.D. was 2.067 and the O.D. was 2.125, I'm not sure the pipe could support its own weight much less any meaningful water pressure.
The inner diameter variation doesn't seem inconsequential to me. At least it seems like every little bit counts when I'm looking to handle the friction loss of a long run uphill with 30+ GPM potential demand and between 1-3psi/100ft available for friction loss depending on how you figure it. Between various 2" pipe:
CTS SDR-9: ID 1.634"
CTS SDR-11: ID 1.723"
IPS SDR-9: ID 1.826"
IPS SDR-11: ID 1.926"
IPS SIDR-9/11: ID 2.067"
I may be overthinking the whole thing or not understanding some aspect, but it seems like according to chart 105.1(5) for SDR-11 plastic tubing in Appendix A of the UPC, the difference between 1.6" and 2" is something like 15-20GPM.
I like the idea of the compression fittings with SDR-11 IPS pipe. I also like the idea of fusing the 2" connection, thanks for that suggestion.