Hi, I am looking to purchase 3 units of one of these toilets, I just can't decide which. My highest priority is that it is as difficult as possible to clog. However, I do care about other things such as price, ease of cleaning, anti-stick coatings (e.g., Cefiontech, etc.). Based on my research, I have the following pros for each toilet:
Toto Ultramax II Pros:
- Cefiontech coating may perform better than Kohler's coating (not really based on anything solid)
- Trapway shape has more gradual bends which I've seen it suggested is meaningful in terms of avoiding clogs
- Overall better reputation for flushes (though not really based on anything solid as far as I can tell)
Kohler Santa Rosa Pros:
- About $100 cheaper per unit for the version with ContinuousClean (approx $470) (I don't mind spending more but worth taking into account)
-ContinuousClean feature: As far as I can tell this feature allows you to put a cleaning tab in your tank without the tablets negatively affecting the hardware in the tank. It seems that Kohler's coating isn't harmed by bleach as they seem to allow you to use bleach tabletss for this feature
As far as cleaning goes, they both seem to be more or less identical. As far as I can tell Santa Rosa seems to have the tornado type flush that Ultramax II has so they both benefit from good coverage during flush and don't have the water coming out of the rim for keeping-it-clean purposes. I'm assuming Ultramax II has the better flush and perhaps better quality control (maybe?), but Kohler's significantly cheaper price and ContinuousClean feature are making me wonder if the Ultramax II is worth it.
I'm quite OCD about cleanliness and toilet clogs kinda freak me out so if there if it is meaningfully less likely that the Ultramax II will clogs, then I don't mind spending the money, but if it isn't clear, then I may lean towards the Santa Rosa as the ContinuousClean feature seems quite appealing.
I would appreciate any input.
Thank you.
Toto Ultramax II Pros:
- Cefiontech coating may perform better than Kohler's coating (not really based on anything solid)
- Trapway shape has more gradual bends which I've seen it suggested is meaningful in terms of avoiding clogs
- Overall better reputation for flushes (though not really based on anything solid as far as I can tell)
Kohler Santa Rosa Pros:
- About $100 cheaper per unit for the version with ContinuousClean (approx $470) (I don't mind spending more but worth taking into account)
-ContinuousClean feature: As far as I can tell this feature allows you to put a cleaning tab in your tank without the tablets negatively affecting the hardware in the tank. It seems that Kohler's coating isn't harmed by bleach as they seem to allow you to use bleach tabletss for this feature
As far as cleaning goes, they both seem to be more or less identical. As far as I can tell Santa Rosa seems to have the tornado type flush that Ultramax II has so they both benefit from good coverage during flush and don't have the water coming out of the rim for keeping-it-clean purposes. I'm assuming Ultramax II has the better flush and perhaps better quality control (maybe?), but Kohler's significantly cheaper price and ContinuousClean feature are making me wonder if the Ultramax II is worth it.
I'm quite OCD about cleanliness and toilet clogs kinda freak me out so if there if it is meaningfully less likely that the Ultramax II will clogs, then I don't mind spending the money, but if it isn't clear, then I may lean towards the Santa Rosa as the ContinuousClean feature seems quite appealing.
I would appreciate any input.
Thank you.
Last edited: