Thermostat Wiring question

Users who are viewing this thread

nola mike

Member
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Richmond, VA
It looks like you can just swap the the L1 and L2 input to change the transformer phase, If needed.
Everything appears to be Isolated by the transformer.

Done. The voltage between the R wires is now 3vac. I get 24v between the TV and Z/T terminals. However, I get 24v between Z/T and ground--Doesn't this mean that the system isn't isolated and I have a problem?

Keep in mind that if you do manage to combine the 24vac controls, while the high voltage stuff won't come on, you'll still have voltage on the other unit when you turn the power off to it and things like relays can be turning on and off. That can be particularly scary if you're working on it when that happens.

Lots of things you could do in a laboratory situation, but not a great idea in the real world for everyday users - you want it idiot proof, and primarily, safe.

So, aside from being careful to turn of both units when servicing, any other safety issues/concerns?

Lastly, could someone explain to me exactly how changing the phase resulted in a decrease in voltage? Were/are my transformers essentially wired in series, so that when the 2 ac currents are out of phase, the max amplitude of the sine wave (and therefore voltage) is equal to only one xformer's output, and when they're in phase, the waves stack on top of each other and become additive? And would switching the breakers to different legs on the main electrical panel have the same effect?
 

DonL

Jack of all trades Master of one
Messages
5,205
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Houston, TX
It is all about the angle of the dangle. And the phase will make the voltage add or subtract.

And Yes switching the breakers to different legs on the main electrical panel would have the same effect. But the other way was easier, switching at the transformer.


Have Fun.
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,982
Reaction score
4,472
Points
113
Location
IL
Lastly, could someone explain to me exactly how changing the phase resulted in a decrease in voltage? Were/are my transformers essentially wired in series, so that when the 2 ac currents are out of phase, the max amplitude of the sine wave (and therefore voltage) is equal to only one xformer's output, and when they're in phase, the waves stack on top of each other and become additive? And would switching the breakers to different legs on the main electrical panel have the same effect?

I don't know how your transformers are wired. The Honeywell link does not work for me. The best description of how a typical thermostat works, that I have found, is "Thermostatic Wiring Principles: by Bob Scaringe Ph.D., P.E. http://www.epatest.com/store/resources/images/misc/how-a-thermostat-operates.pdf
Let's assume your original system was wired as shown on page 8. huge2.pngThis is slightly modified version of the page 8 schematic.

The thermostat's job is to connect either the Rc or Rh, as appropriate, to whatever is being controlled, or to provide an open circuit to turn the thing off. The thing being controlled , such as a relay, would be connected between the controlled terminal and C. Thus power provided = on. Open provided = off.

The two transformers in the page 8 2-transformer situation don't have either terminal of either transformer connected together.

In your thermostat, there is only an R terminal. Now the thermostat cannot provide power from the just the appropriate supply. Instead it can only provide power from the one terminal, if I understood the discussions here. I think that Rh and Rc could be connected to R since the non R legs of the transformer are not connected together.

Transformers should not normally have secondary windings in parallel. So connecting two transformers to a single R terminal and also connecting the other side of each transformer to a C terminal would be bad.

Suppose Rh and RC are connected together in your situation. Let's call the other secondary lead of the transformer that connects to Rh to be Ch. Let's call the other transformer's C line Cc.
Anyway, are transformer secondaries that have one wire in common in series? You could think of them that way. But since there is no real load AFAIK that is between Ch and Cc, there doesn't seem to be a reason to consider them to be in series or not.

That is until you put your voltmeter where you put it. Now you see the effects of the transformers, for this purpose, being in series. Depending on the phase, you will see more or less voltage between the terminals that you are measuring between. Yet that voltage is only academic.

If you reverse the primary lines on one transformer, you should get the same effect as reversing the secondary lines on that transformer. The phase changes. So yes, if you wire one of the transformers to a different side of the AC line, the phase changes.

To see a description of how you can get less voltage from two transformers in series, look up "bucking transformer". In an example of a typical case, a 120 vac transformer is put in series with a 12 vac transformer. Depending on how the wires are phased, you get 132 (boost) or 108 vac (buck).

So yes the voltages add, but they add as vectors or complex numbers. When we say 120 vac, that is only the magnitude, and magnitude is sufficient for most purposes. For computing the effects of combining voltage sources in AC, we need to include the phase in the math.

In the kind of thing you are doing here, considering only 0 degrees and 180 degrees is enough for most simple calculations. You can make a simple model by thinking of a 120 volt DC battery in series with a 12 volt battery. In 3-phase, it gets harder. The supply voltages are 120 degrees apart; the battery analogies don't work in that case.
 

Attachments

  • huge1.png
    huge1.png
    56.5 KB · Views: 520
Last edited:

DonL

Jack of all trades Master of one
Messages
5,205
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Houston, TX
That was nice Reach4. What is the name of your book ?


Are we having fun yet ?
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,770
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
Another way to look at it is, between L1 and L2, when one is going positive, the other is going negative. Depending on how each system is installed, if both units have L1 on the same terminal, they'd be in phase, but if they were swapped, both L1's on different units, would be going in opposite directions, and when measuring the difference between the two, when they're in phase, you'd have zero volts, but when they're opposite, you have the sum of the two. Works the same when it goes through a step-down transformer. Note, it really doesn't matter between two systems what phase they call the 'R' lead relative to the incoming or supply voltage.

The fact that you have 3vac between the two could be related to the output of each transformer may not be exactly the same or they were not careful about the phase angle when designing and winding the coils (not particularly critical on this type of device). It also means that there's a constant current running between the two - now, whether in the long term, that might create problems, I do not know. It would be much better if it was zero.
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks