Why does drywall work in a Kerdi Shower?

Users who are viewing this thread

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
First, neither tile nor grout is totally waterproof, so whatever you use in a shower must not be damaged by moisture. Typically, people would use cement board on the walls with a vapor barrier behind it since none of those components are waterproof, BUT, none of them are damaged by being wet. The vapor barrier prevents any moisture trapped in those materials from being in contact with the wood studs and structure. The same thing is true on the floor of your shower...there's a waterproof layer preventing water from getting to it.

So, it's not a long stretch to realize that if you do put drywall in a shower, if must be kept from ever getting wet or you'll have problems. This is exactly what the Kerdi membrane does...it is a very effective waterproofing layer. Just like the liner in your shower keeps the wooden subfloor from rotting out or ever getting wet, the membrane does it for not only the walls but the floor. So, if you built it properly - the drywall stays dry, the floor stays dry, and everything works out well.

As with anything, if you make a mistake or breech the waterproof layer, you'll have problems. But, after installation and a flood test, the entire surface is covered with tile, so that layer remains well protected, and is easily able to do its job.

Some related concepts: why can you use wood underneath your roofing shingles? Because when properly installed, the roof doesn't leak. Why can you use drywall on the inside walls next to your windows? Because a properly installed window doesn't leak. Sure, you can break the window or have wind blow a shingle off, but that's hardly likely to happen inside of a properly built shower covered in tile!

Schluter has ben using Kerdi over drywall for decades, and since the certification doesn't last forever, has been getting it retested to reverify it still works to stay in compliance bi-annually. The ICC (International Code Council) test report ESR-2467 covers the certification for both Ditra and Kerdi and is only valid if you follow the manufacturer's installation instructions. While other methods might work over drywall, to my knowledge, none have the history or the certification, or test data to show that they work properly in that environment. So, do not take Schluter's experience with Kerdi make you think that another system is certified, tested, and warranted in other than their tested, approved substrates.

FWIW, that report is valid over the following surfaces in a shower (from section 2.0):
"Kerdi is intended for use on floors over concrete, mortar and tile backerboard substrates. Kerdi is also used as shower lining, as required in IRC Section P2709.2 and IPC Section 417.5.2, over concrete, mortar, tile backerboard, expanded polystyrene foam board, prefabricated polystyrene shower trays, curb and ramp, gypsum board and masonry substrates."

So, you can choose what board you want in your shower when using Kerdi. Schluter's recommendation is drywall since it is available in larger sheets so you have fewer seams, accepts thinset well, and allows excess moisture from the thinset to be purged while maintaining a suitable environment for the thinset to cure and attain its best strength.

Kerdi will work equally well with any of the approved substrates - choose the one you want, install it per the manufacturer's instructions and you'll have a long-lasting, problem-free shower. Don't let any nay-sayers force you into any other extra steps by making you feel guilty...IF you do it right, it will not leak. IF it does, fix it before you put up your tile. Based on the certification, doing it otherwise could void the warranty and the certification of the Building Codes.
 

Eurob

master tile and stone installer
Messages
824
Reaction score
53
Points
28
Location
Montreal
Website
www.houzz.com
First, neither tile nor grout is totally waterproof, so whatever you use in a shower must not be damaged by moisture. Typically, people would use cement board on the walls with a vapor barrier behind it since none of those components are waterproof, BUT, none of them are damaged by being wet. The vapor barrier prevents any moisture trapped in those materials from being in contact with the wood studs and structure. The same thing is true on the floor of your shower...there's a waterproof layer preventing water from getting to it.

So, it's not a long stretch to realize that if you do put drywall in a shower, if must be kept from ever getting wet or you'll have problems. This is exactly what the Kerdi membrane does...it is a very effective waterproofing layer. Just like the liner in your shower keeps the wooden subfloor from rotting out or ever getting wet, the membrane does it for not only the walls but the floor. So, if you built it properly - the drywall stays dry, the floor stays dry, and everything works out well.

As with anything, if you make a mistake or breech the waterproof layer, you'll have problems. But, after installation and a flood test, the entire surface is covered with tile, so that layer remains well protected, and is easily able to do its job.

Some related concepts: why can you use wood underneath your roofing shingles? Because when properly installed, the roof doesn't leak. Why can you use drywall on the inside walls next to your windows? Because a properly installed window doesn't leak. Sure, you can break the window or have wind blow a shingle off, but that's hardly likely to happen inside of a properly built shower covered in tile!

Schluter has ben using Kerdi over drywall for decades, and since the certification doesn't last forever, has been getting it retested to reverify it still works to stay in compliance bi-annually. The ICC (International Code Council) test report ESR-2467 covers the certification for both Ditra and Kerdi and is only valid if you follow the manufacturer's installation instructions. While other methods might work over drywall, to my knowledge, none have the history or the certification, or test data to show that they work properly in that environment. So, do not take Schluter's experience with Kerdi make you think that another system is certified, tested, and warranted in other than their tested, approved substrates.

If we have to look at an engineering POV , using the drywall in showers or wet areas is a no-no . The codes are a minimum -- repeat a minimum -- of building procedures to respect . Kinda strange to see you coming so strong with it as a recommendation .

Drywall compared with plywood is by far an inferior product . And talking about roof leaks -- most of the showers are build under roofs -- , if the tiled ceiling gets wet , the drywall will collapse . If the walls are getting wet ...

Quote :
" Moisture Movement (Wicking) within Gypsum Wallboard
Paper # 580
Dale J Greenwell and Marc Y Menetrez
US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC
27711
ABSTRACT
Gypsum wallboard with repeated or prolonged exposure to water or excess moisture can lose
its structural integrity and provide a growth medium for biological contaminants. Poorly sealed
buildings, leaking or failed plumbing systems, or improperly constructed HVAC systems can all
contribute to water and moisture problems. Gypsum wallboard readily absorbs moisture through
direct contact with standing water and differences in water vapor pressure. Regular gypsum
wallboard sample sections were hung vertically and exposed to a continuous source of standing
water 1.3 cm in depth. Both water absorption (measured in percent moisture content) and
vertical movement (wicking height) were monitored within the wallboard over several days. The
moisture content measurements revealed a water movement pattern similar to paper
chromatography. A leading edge of relative high percent moisture content (~ 20%MC) moved
upward along the width of the wallboard. The immersed portion of the wallboard maintained a
moisture content level ≥ 20%. Between the leading edge and immersed portion of the wallboard
was an area of moderate moisture content (~ 12%MC). Water wicked to a height of 15 cm
within the first three hours of testing after which the rate continued asymptotically appearing to
reach a maximum height by day 16.
IMPLICATIONS
Most wallboard remediation techniques involve visual inspection and moisture content
measurements to determine the extent of the water damage and the presence of or potential for
mold growth. Remediation not performed within a reasonable time following discovery, may
result in ineffective remediation as moisture may continue to move beyond the original detected
region. Because of the wide spread used of gypsum wallboard in commercial and residential
construction, understanding the moisture movement (wicking) of water in gypsum wallboard
products is essential. ''

End quote .

If you want to rely only on the membrane -- Kerdi or similar -- for waterproofing and not consider the safety of the assembly , I think you are doing a good job .
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
No argument that when drywall gets wet, it loses integrity. But, it is no more likely to get wet in a properly built Kerdi shower than it is on the ceiling under a solid roof or next to a window or a door. The point being - Kerdi is proven waterproof when installed properly. Therefore, any tested and approved material used underneath it can produce a reliable, long-lasting shower. Use any one of the approved materials and it still works fine. When installed properly, the only way drywall (gypsum board) will get wet is from some other way, and that's not a problem with the shower build.

Once the shower is flood tested, then covered with tile, it is going to take some other fault in the house for it to cause a problem in the shower. I don't have any issue about which substrate you end up deciding to use, I have an objection to the years of test data that says it works, passes building codes, and is warranted by the manufacturer that has a vested interest in it working being touted as wrong.

Just in case the roof leaked, do you put CBU on the ceiling? What about next to a window or a door? No, you accept that whoever put the roof up or the door or window in did it properly, and if you have a fault, you fix it.

If you're really paranoid, you could make your house entirely out of cement, stone, and tile...then, if it got wet because of some misstep, you'd just mop up.
 
Last edited:

Eurob

master tile and stone installer
Messages
824
Reaction score
53
Points
28
Location
Montreal
Website
www.houzz.com
All of this coming from an engineer .........surprising.

I guess you are working only on the membrane level and the rest is not important . Drywall , like other products, are only accepted by Schluter for a shower installation . None of the drywall mfgs recommends the use of drywall in wet areas.

I guess long lasting is less important than your coating of inferior products. Reminds me of the arguments that drywall contribute to increase the structural #s when calculate them . Probably they will also accept an inferior product saying that if everything else is done right , the walls will not buckle. Such a mediocrecy .
 
Last edited:

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
What happens to the wooden structure of the room when a shower pan leaks? The subfloor rots, the floor plate rots, the studs and maybe the joists rot.

If we trust Kerdi to protect the floor from getting wet, why can't you trust it to protect the walls?

Millions of square feet of tile has been successfully installed on drywall, so the bond to that substrate is a known thing.

If you believe Kerdi is waterproof, tests have shown it to be, why would you believe it can work as a pan liner and not also protect the walls it is installed on?

Agreed, drywall in a conventional shower is stupid. A Kerdi shower is no more a conventional shower than a salt crystal is a diamond.

If you don't trust yourself to install Kerdi properly, like apparently John Whipple, you use all of the extras you can think of to patch it and provide secondary layers of protection. Most people believe their roof will keep the house dry, the windows will keep out the rain, as will the doors when properly installed. People don't give a second thought to the use of drywall underneath the roof - look at the millions of square feet of cathedral ceilings, or the millions of homes with drywall next to the windows and doors.

It is not such a great leap to believe that neither the walls nor the floor of a properly built Kerdi shower will ever get wet. If it did fail, regardless of the materials, it won't make a difference what's there...you'd have to tear it out and repair it. So, build it right the first time...it works.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
None of the drywall mfgs recommends the use of drywall in wet areas.

Explain to me why if Kerdi works as a pan liner, and one does not consider the subfloor under a shower a wet area, why is drywall behind a waterproof membrane that has been tested and approved for use in a shower, that drywall is in a wet area?

The whole point of this is that when installed properly, NOTHING on the other side of Kerdi is in a wet area.

If you do not believe Kerdi is waterproof, why would you ever use it as a pan liner?
 

DonL

Jack of all trades Master of one
Messages
5,205
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Houston, TX
You guys Crack me up.

You are good Free Entertainment.

They use Drywall in Shower stalls here in my location. I do not know enough about to tell if it is right or wrong.

The inspectors must see it as OK.

Your Location may very.

There are not many locations around the Coast here, where it is not a damp location. Dry wall works just fine.


Keep it coming Guys, I get a kick out of the entertainment that you provide.


Popcorn-02-Stephen-Colbert.jpg


Have Fun Everyone.
 
Last edited:

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
I know it's wrong and the only reference you can hang on to is that Schluter says it's OK.

Do you not put any credibility to the ICC? If when they tested if it failed, would they risk their standing and reputation? What about the hundreds of thousands of Kerdi showers that have been built that don't leak? ANY shower can fail if there are workmanship problems, and if it does, it really doesn't matter what's behind the waterproofing...it has to come out to be fixed.

Massachusetts requires any plumbing work to only use approved materials and methods - they list Kerdi, the Kerdi drain in their database WHEN INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. They do not, the last time I looked, exclude or make exceptions for the use of drywall in that install. http://license.reg.state.ma.us/pubL...ld&model=&product=kerdi&description=&psize=50 This is just one example...
 

DougB

Member
Messages
341
Reaction score
22
Points
18
Location
Minneapolis - Land of 10,000 taxes
As an engineer (I don't think that matters), and as a pratical person, I can't for the life of me understand why someone would usee drywall in a shower! If you had just a teeny tiny leak - the drywall is going to go to shit. Cement board could tolerate it, and maybe with no ill effects.

What do you save by using drywall? $50? Why risk it? What's the point? Because it can be done?

If a fixture would leak behind the drywall - you would be sunk.

I would say using drywall in a wet area: safety factor = 0.9 :)
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
Notice that the original title says why you CAN use it in a shower...it doesn't say you HAVE to...

But, why? For the same reasons I do not worry about drywall on my ceiling, or next to my doors or windows. A leak there will have the same effect-tear out and fix. But, I've lived in this place for nearly 30-years, and I've never had to replace any drywall because of water leaks through the roof or from around windows or doors. Drywall is readily available in bigger sheets, cuts easily without carcinogenic dust so it has fewer joints that have to be supported with blocking, unlike the typical 3x5' sheets of cbu (yes, you can special order bigger sheets, but then try to get them to the job site unbroken and then you still have to lift them!). Over those 30-years, I've not had a water supply pipe fail where it leaked and caused damage. Why would you expect it to do it in your shower? There are seals made for protecting any penetrations through the Kerdi membrane for around things like the shower arm, and valves. Or, KerdiFix works, too. There is no reason why the drywall behind the shower wall is any more likely to get wet than in the rest of the house IF you build it properly.
 

Dhagin

builder:anti-builder
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Oahu
Ain't gonna get in a pissin match with you fellas, but drywall and other gypsum boards, as a backer, have been used successfully in showers since it came out. See: mud shower. Mud showers with asphalt impregnated building paper, or plastic over the drywall work just fine and have since before I was born, over 50 years ago.

Schluter has a proprietary system that has been tested to meet or exceed industry standards. Plain fact is, their system works. You wanna not trust the manufacturer or industry who approves their products for their intended uses, when there are successful installs over drywall functioning just fine for many years out there, that's certainly your prerogative. :)
 

DougB

Member
Messages
341
Reaction score
22
Points
18
Location
Minneapolis - Land of 10,000 taxes
As with anything, if you make a mistake or breech the waterproof layer, you'll have problems. off, but that's hardly likely to happen inside of a properly built

There is a concept called risk. That's why there's insurance, hedge funds, etc.

Don't let any nay-sayers force you into any other extra steps by making you feel guilty...

Well it seems to me (just a DIY'er - gutted three bathrooms) that cement board and hydroban or redguard is less work than the extra steps of mixing thinset and applying the Kerdi

IF you do it right, it will not leak. IF it does, fix it before you put up your tile.

You're not going to know if it leaks at a seam.

Based on the certification, doing it otherwise could void the warranty

Warranty? Really? I would suppose nobody has ever collected on it, cause if was installed 'properly' it would not leak. Therefore if it leaks, it wasn't installed properly.
 

DonL

Jack of all trades Master of one
Messages
5,205
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Houston, TX
I Love a good Contest.

I wish I knew enough about the subject to get in.

Watching can be fun.


Pissing_Contest.jpg
 

DougB

Member
Messages
341
Reaction score
22
Points
18
Location
Minneapolis - Land of 10,000 taxes
Schluter has a proprietary system that has been tested to meet or exceed industry standards. Plain fact is, their system works. You wanna not trust the manufacturer or industry who approves their products for their intended uses, when there are successful installs over drywall functioning just fine for many years out there, that's certainly your prerogative.

IMO sites like this are frequented by DIY'ers who don't do this every day. It's my opinion that Kerdi will be more challenging for a person doing it for the first time, and maybe the only time.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
IMO sites like this are frequented by DIY'ers who don't do this every day. It's my opinion that Kerdi will be more challenging for a person doing it for the first time, and maybe the only time.

More challenging in what way? A conventional shower's liner requires some very detailed steps to ensure the liner is waterproof where you MUST cut it to fit over the curb, then seal corners on it, and maybe seam it if the sheet isn't big enough. The biggest worry about water leaks are at the pan and over the curb - gravity just dictates that the water is going to go there. Flood test it before you cover it with tile, just like a Kerdi build...fix it if it leaks. Especially on a wall, after the thinset cures, water does not wick very far into a seam, and if you build it correctly, you have at LEAST 2" of overlap. Prior to full cure, yes, it can weep in further, but even after a day, if you did it right, the pan does not leak. If you haphazardly put holes in your curb, you're an idiot, and anything that happens as a result, regardless of whether it is Kerdi on it or a conventional liner, you're going to have problems.

As to a surface, paint on waterproofing...I'll take a manufactured waterproof sheet any day over a waterproofing material I have to paint on and worry if it is without pinholes or is the proper thickness over the entire area to do its job properly.
 

Jim Mills

New Member
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
nebraska
My only thought would be this. If I build two showers for someone, both on the second story of a two story house, a master and a mail bath. Lets say that I used kerdi over drywall in one, and kerdi over CMU in the other. A year after I finish, I get a call: "Jim, we have spots on the ceiling below both showers you built". Is my response: "Oh, we will have to gut & re-do the one I drywalled, but the other will be fine because we used CMU".

I'm trying to figure out your logic that a water resistant material behind a waterproof membrane is better, because in a surface applied waterproofing system, if water gets past it...it's a total failure no matter what's behind it.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,771
Reaction score
1,191
Points
113
Location
New England
I'm trying to figure out your logic that a water resistant material behind a waterproof membrane is better, because in a surface applied waterproofing system, if water gets past it...it's a total failure no matter what's behind it.

If you think this way, why don't you use it on the ceiling in case your roof leaks, or around your windows and doors? Installed properly, it works. Nothing says you can't use the other materials, but, if it DID leak, eventually, you'd still have to tear out and fix it.

I have no problem if you wish to use any of the approved materials, it's just that I do object to the jerk reaction that it WILL fail if you use drywall there after it has been tested and proven, done properly, it doesn't matter.

I think we can both agree that drywall is quicker and easier to put up than cbu, and costs less. It works. The choice is yours, just don't tell me it won't work and will fail, because that has never been proven or demonstrated when installed properly. And, having done it, it really isn't all that hard to do properly. Pretty simple rules, ensure proper coverage by periodically pulling back the membrane to verify coverage, and make all of your seams at least a 2" overlap...anyone attempting to build a shower should be able to handle that. If not, pay someone to do it for you.
 

DougB

Member
Messages
341
Reaction score
22
Points
18
Location
Minneapolis - Land of 10,000 taxes
If you think this way, why don't you use it on the ceiling in case your roof leaks, or around your windows and doors?

Because your ceilings and walls are not subjected to gallons and gallons of water every day.

drywall is quicker and easier to put up.. and costs less

Well they sell 108 sq/ft of Kerdi for $164. Then you need corners and tape and pipe seals and mixing valve seal. Then too, you have the thin set cost.

Here's what one fellow worte. Bought it, ... called Schluter for a couple of questions relating to steam shower application...and guess what! All warranties are OFF (as in null and void) when purchased online.

What a scam!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Loudgonzo

New Member
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Wylie, Tx
If you think this way, why don't you use it on the ceiling in case your roof leaks, or around your windows and doors? Installed properly, it works. Nothing says you can't use the other materials, but, if it DID leak, eventually, you'd still have to tear out and fix it.

I have no problem if you wish to use any of the approved materials, it's just that I do object to the jerk reaction that it WILL fail if you use drywall there after it has been tested and proven, done properly, it doesn't matter.

I think we can both agree that drywall is quicker and easier to put up than cbu, and costs less. It works. The choice is yours, just don't tell me it won't work and will fail, because that has never been proven or demonstrated when installed properly. And, having done it, it really isn't all that hard to do properly. Pretty simple rules, ensure proper coverage by periodically pulling back the membrane to verify coverage, and make all of your seams at least a 2" overlap...anyone attempting to build a shower should be able to handle that. If not, pay someone to do it for you.

Here's a wider picture of our bath, the stand in shower on the left will be torn out and converted to a storage closet after the walk in shower is completed on the right side. The shower valve and head will be mounted on the wall that is dividing the shower and alcove right now.

My reason for using hardi instead of sheetrock is based on the following "what if"; If a leak develops around the valve or along the plumbing on that divider wall, the soon to be closet wall can be torn down and the leak fixed, the hardi is more resistant to water damage and can prevent tear down of shower tile, since we would be able to access it from the back in this case, where if the drywall were to get wet from a leak, it would have to be replaced requiring total tear down?

Is my assumption above correct, or am I overlooking something? In short, I can rely on waterproofing the exposed side, but will hardi be better than drywall in this scenario?

thanks
Leo

photo (28).jpg
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks