Toto Ultramax, Could be happier, another option?

Discussion in 'Toilet Forum discussions' started by socal, Jun 15, 2005.

  1. socal

    socal New Member

    Apr 19, 2005
    Replaced an old builders special high flow last year with the Toto Ultramax one piece elongated, non-Sanagloss, 1.6gal. The Ultramax flushes well, doesn't sound too loud, has never run slowly or clogged but it has a drawback.

    Solid waste seems to leave skid marks sometimes (more often than not). It is mostly under the waterline but sometimes above the waterline as well. This residue doesn't go away when initially flushed or even on a second flush. We must brush after intial flush and then flush again. Of course this seems to defeat the purpose of the low flush and is a bother to boot.

    Are any others experiencing this unsightly and embarassing problem? Is there something we could do to solve this problem? We are about to redo 2 more bathrooms and like the Toto but for this drawback. Is there another model that is better? Would the Sanagloss option fix this problem?
  2. Terry

    Terry Administrator Staff Member

    Aug 17, 2004
    Bothell, Washington
    The Sanagloss version is better.

    With only 1.6 gallons, it is different.
    You do have the option of holding the handle down to drop another gallon or two.
  3. Sponsor

    Sponsor Paid Advertisement

Similar Threads: Toto Ultramax
Forum Title Date
Toilet Forum discussions Toto Ultramax II - 1.0 or 1.28 GPF? Mar 12, 2015
Toilet Forum discussions Need 3 new toilets: Toto Ultramax II or American Standard options Feb 20, 2015
Toilet Forum discussions Any thoughts on the 1.0 GPF TOTO toilets (Drake II and Ultramax II)? Jan 20, 2015
Toilet Forum discussions TOTO - which Ultramax II model to choose Jan 10, 2015
Toilet Forum discussions Terry: I need to buy 3 replacement toilets, which Toto? Drake,Ultramax, Ultramax II? Jan 4, 2015

Share This Page