What "IS" hard versus soft water

OldSalt

Member
Messages
53
Reaction score
8
Points
8
Location
Northern Idaho
Yeah, I know, I can do an AI search and get a decent answer, i.e. high mineral content, excessive Calcium and/or Magnesium. When I query Amazon for hardwater test kits, virtually all of them define "hard water" in terms of PPM. I have installed a new water softener, and need to figure out how to test it's efficiency in providing actually softened water. The manufacturer tells me PPM isn't a valid standard.

Here's my situation:

1) My home has hard water, evidenced by the information provided by the water company (estimated 177 PPM), as well as the hard water scale problems we have. After almost a decade of working around the issue, I bit the bullet, found a compact water unit from iSpring (WCS50KG, 50K grain capacity), purchased and installed it.

2) I have a cheap, electronic PPM tester that I baseline tested against distilled water (zero PPM), bottled drinking water (20 PPM), and my tap water (170 PPM).

3) After installation, configuration (i.e. 9.9 GPG, 3 persons in the household), and clearing the home's taps of prior hard water, I tested the outside tap water against the indoor, presumably softened, water faucets. After installation, 145 PPM. To put it mildly, I was ticked that after all the work and expense to install this thing, no soft water? (Soft water on the charts I've seen is 60 PPM or below.)

4) I called iSpring, the manufacturer and asked "what now". Their customer service rep said "You can't test water for hardness with PPM alone. Soft water replaces calcium and magnesium ions with salt ions, softening the water, but the PPM rate may remain the same or be even higher afterwards. I then asked him, how do I test your unit to ensure it's working to spec, i.e. producing soft water below PPM. He backed into another conversation about TDS (total dissolved solids), how it compares to PPM (it doesn't), and so forth. He wasn't answering my question, so I asked him to escalate the ticket to management.

5) The customer service manager called, and essentially repeated the same thing. He noted that there were important configuration settings (which I had set), that make a difference. He also said that as shipped, the units are set for "high salt efficiency" to use the minimum salt necessary. He recommended I set it from salt high efficiency to "standard", to obtain softer water. (Again, no test standard, other than "send it to a lab".) In fact, there's no such "Salt Efficiency" setting on their menu. As referenced in the manual, under "Advanced", a user CAN override their standard settings for the backwash, brine soak, rinse, and etc. to run longer or shorter. However, there's no specs on those figures from the manufacturer, i.e. I'd just be ballparking it.

6) Besides, all that those settings accomplish is to "automatically calculate" how long the regeneration cycle runs, or parts there of, and how frequently. My understanding is that soft water systems haven't changed much since the 1970s, back when my dad had a unit in our home. Water runs across a resin which has "sticky" sodium ions, which attract calcium and magnesium ions, which are exchanged for the sodium ions, thus resulting in softer water, water containing an exceptionally low additional sodium. Which means that no matter how frequently or how long the regeneration cycle runs, if there's salt brine in the brine enclosure, resin in the resin tank, and the brine has been pumped across the resin (in my system, for 90 minutes), after rinsing, for chemical reasons, THE WATER PROCESSED MUST BE SOFTENED.

7) How can this unit NOT soften water? How is it not possible to test to verify the results of ANY water softener? I'm lost here.

8) Fact check: I did run the simple household test of a few drops of soap in equal bottles of water, one hard tap, and one from the indoor softened taps. The indoor water did instantly full with bubbles, to the point where it couldn't be shook. After setting it down, the water below the bubbles cleared within seconds. The exterior hard water also generated bubbles, but not nearly as much, and the water was milky. (Note, after 5-10 minutes, both bottles reacted similarly, but that's likely because the dish detergent I used wasn't pure soap, but also contained additives to prevent streaking that effectively softened the water.) Second, during showers, the water did "feel" more slippery.

9) Bottom line: How do I figure out whether this unit is working properly? Using PPM as an objective standard (correctly or not), there's a heck of difference between 145 PPM and 60 PPM (or maybe 30 PPM, as some users have reported). I want to be able to test for that now, and test the unit's effectiveness over time between regenerations. I have a full spectrum (17 test) kit we'll use tomorrow. However, I don't see calcium or magnesium tests in this kit, just "Hardness" measured in PPM. The test will include minerals like iron, which will be helpful to know.

Thanks for reading through this. I missed the "short and concise writing" course back in school.

Scott

Attached: A picture of my busy water heater closet. The water softener is dead center, the Rinnai condensing tankless hot water heater is to the right, the water main line, inbound spin down filter, irrigation backflow preventer and line to the exterior water taps, run to the left. On the back wall, is a makeshift bypass valve (i.e. three valves), to enable me to separate and remove the water softener without interrupting household water. (The iSpring softener control valve includes it's own bypass valve at the rear, but again, I wanted to be able to detach and remove the unit if I needed to service anything else (e.g. the condensation line filter in back). No comments required about the ridiculous, amateur plumbing job. Trust me, it's better (in appearance and operation) than anything the original pro plumbers did back when they installed the Rinnai unit, when I built this house.
 

Attachments

  • WaterHeaterCloset-3.jpg
    WaterHeaterCloset-3.jpg
    88.4 KB · Views: 251

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,025
Reaction score
5,164
Points
113
Location
IL
You are confusing TDS (total dissolved solids) with hardness. A softener does not reduce TDS. It can increase TDS even though it is working. It reduces hardness. TDS is usually expressed in ppm which is the same as milligrams per liter.

To measure hardness, get a Hach 5B test. Use that to test for raw hardness. Use that to test for residual hardness.

Hardness can be expressed as ppm, but it is usually expressed as grains of hardness in the US. 177/17.1=10.4 grains.

A TDS meter has very limited use for softening.
 

OldSalt

Member
Messages
53
Reaction score
8
Points
8
Location
Northern Idaho
You are confusing TDS (total dissolved solids) with hardness. A softener does not reduce TDS. It can increase TDS even though it is working. It reduces hardness. TDS is usually expressed in ppm which is the same as milligrams per liter.

To measure hardness, get a Hach 5B test. Use that to test for raw hardness. Use that to test for residual hardness.

Hardness can be expressed as ppm, but it is usually expressed as grains of hardness in the US. 177/17.1=10.4 grains.

A TDS meter has very limited use for softening.
Just ordered the Hach kit. We'll see how things work out, and I'll provide an update. Thanks a bunch!
 

OldSalt

Member
Messages
53
Reaction score
8
Points
8
Location
Northern Idaho
You are confusing TDS (total dissolved solids) with hardness. A softener does not reduce TDS. It can increase TDS even though it is working. It reduces hardness. TDS is usually expressed in ppm which is the same as milligrams per liter.

To measure hardness, get a Hach 5B test. Use that to test for raw hardness. Use that to test for residual hardness.

Hardness can be expressed as ppm, but it is usually expressed as grains of hardness in the US. 177/17.1=10.4 grains.

A TDS meter has very limited use for softening.
Thanks for this. As noted in my original post under "fact check", I did run the soap test (using what I had available, i.e. dish detergent), and the "soft water" did pass that test. So, what's coming out of the water softener is definitely not what's going in to it.

Part of the reason I want to see truly objective, scientific test results, is that I was conned into buying a WAY overly priced "no salt whole house water softener" (back when we lived in Southern California). It was nothing but a large tank of carbon filter media. It also, did do "something", but didn't produce soft water, and didn't save my plumbing, fixtures, and the rest. In addition to the electronic TDS meter being an invalid test (which are all presented as "PPM meter to detect hard water" on Amazon), I've read that the test strips can yield inconsistent results. So, we'll go with the Hach test kit, which is a chemical test kit that detects measures calcium carbonate (CaCO3), using the "Drop count titration/EDTA-bulk powder" method. If GPG is 0 to 3, we'll call it good and quit bothering iSpring. (That is my FERVANT hope, because returning this unit will involved a whole lot of work, plus finding a replacement that will fit.)
 

Bannerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,462
Reaction score
1,057
Points
113
Location
Ontario, Canada
WAY overly priced "no salt whole house water softener
Although often marketed as a 'Water Softener', a unit that does not utilize cation resin and salt for ion exchange, is commonly considered at best to be a 'Water Conditioner'.

Hardness removal, is performed by exchanging calcium and magnesium ions (main minerals which cause hardness), with sodium ions. The quantity of sodium added to softened water, will be in direct proportion to the quantity of hardness minerals which are removed through ion exchange.

It was nothing but a large tank of carbon filter media. It also, did do "something", but didn't produce soft water,
While carbon is a very effective filtration media for removing chlorine, odors, many other chemicals and contaminants, and off colors, carbon media does not have an ability to remove 'hardness' minerals.

TDS meter being an invalid test (which are all presented as "PPM meter to detect hard water"
PPM stands for 'parts per million'. PPM is not a type of 'test', but various lab tests often report the quantity of various minerals, metals and chemicals as PPM, or sometimes PPB (parts per billion) when the quantity measured is extremely small.

TDS means 'Total Dissolved Solids'. Because an electronic TDS meter, measures electrical conductivity to only estimate the amount of disolved solids in the water, it cannot report the quantity of each specific type of dissolved solid. While calcium and magnesium (hardness minerals) will be included in the TDS PPM quantity reported, so will many other dissolved solids including but not limited to sodium, chloride, manganese and iron.

As mentioned above, because a water softener removes hardness by exchanging the calcium and magnesium ions with sodium ions, a TDS PPM comparison of the raw and softened water will often read identical, or the TDS result of the softened water may actually read higher than the raw water TDS.

A TDS meter is often utilized to measure the effectiveness of a Reverse Osmosis system since an RO membrane, will typically provide a benefit in the reduction of TDS.

If GPG is 0 to 3, we'll call it good and quit bothering iSpring.
Technically, any hardness measured in the water will indicate the water is hard, but low levels of hardness are usually not considered to cause a problem. While many would not consider the need for a softener when the incoming hardness is moderate such as 8 gpg or less, test results have indicated there is some benefit to removing hardness with a softener when the hardness level is 3 gpg or greater.
 

OldSalt

Member
Messages
53
Reaction score
8
Points
8
Location
Northern Idaho
Welp, the verdict is in. I pretty much got the same result as this guy reported back in 2013 using the same Hach 5b kit.
HACH #5B Hardness Test Kit Question.

We have soft water.

The indoor tap (softened) water with the powdered hardness regent added, should have turned pink. Instead, it immediately turned blue, without adding the titrant solution. We went ahead and added 1-3 drops of the titrant, and while the solution might have turned a bit more blue, there wasn't a substantial difference. Then we tested against the exterior tap (unsoftened) water, and it required 9 to 10 drops to turn from pink to blue.

So, bottom line is we have about the 9.9 or 10 gpg from the city water (which is pumped from a limestone aquifer. The iSpring water softener changed that to less than 1 gpg. We have VERY soft water coming from this unit. Since the regeneration cycle is based on a calculated gallons of water used projection, based on the waters gpg and number of people using the house (in other words, it's a slightly educated WAG), I intend to retest the water periodically to see if the hardness increases as the meter show's ready for regeneration. After this first week, the meters shows less than 25% usage. If this unit doesn't need to regenerate for 3-4 weeks, I'll be jumping for joy at it's efficiency. Disclaimer: It's a 50KG "High Capacity" unit, and I have the number of persons in the household set to 3, when it's actually only my wife and myself because, hey, I like long showers.

Thanks for all the responses. Now I have to go do some updating on the product review and iSprings helpdesk ticket. I'm going to suggest that their customer service people spend less time arguing with, and trying to explain what @Bannerman just wrote out in detail, and simply recommend the Hach kit, or even soap bubble test. (Oh yeah, I'll also apologize for my own misunderstanding, as well.)
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks