comet28024
New Member
Good morning,
I have a situation where our camper had a significant water leak in the bathroom of our RV and I've since pulled out the tub and plan on replacing it with a shower. When I pulled the tub out I realized there was a hidden AAV beneath the tub rim for the vent.
The current plumbing is 1 1/2" ABS and I'd like to keep the drains as low as possible to maximize height.
My questions are 2 fold:
1.) Will the under sink AAV work even though it's roughly 80" from the shower p trap?
2.) Can I run the vent over to the wall where the handles are and turn it up into that wall and use an AAV there?
3.) Any other options, opinions?
I realize that both of these are not code compliant solutions, but this shower will get used 5-10 times a year and I can easily access the AAV in the wall if need be. I'm just trying to give the wife an acceptable shower while maximizing our space. From what I can tell, a lot of the reasoning for not allowing the horizontal vent is due to potential buildup, which in this instance I'm not concerned about.
Thanks,
Erick
I have a situation where our camper had a significant water leak in the bathroom of our RV and I've since pulled out the tub and plan on replacing it with a shower. When I pulled the tub out I realized there was a hidden AAV beneath the tub rim for the vent.
The current plumbing is 1 1/2" ABS and I'd like to keep the drains as low as possible to maximize height.
My questions are 2 fold:
1.) Will the under sink AAV work even though it's roughly 80" from the shower p trap?
2.) Can I run the vent over to the wall where the handles are and turn it up into that wall and use an AAV there?
3.) Any other options, opinions?
I realize that both of these are not code compliant solutions, but this shower will get used 5-10 times a year and I can easily access the AAV in the wall if need be. I'm just trying to give the wife an acceptable shower while maximizing our space. From what I can tell, a lot of the reasoning for not allowing the horizontal vent is due to potential buildup, which in this instance I'm not concerned about.
Thanks,
Erick