Thanks to this forum, I am now almost decided on my choice for a new toilet. In deciding between the TOTO Drake and the TOTO Drake II, I am faced with three questions :
- since I change my actual 1,28 gpf toilet because it leaves to much strikes in the bowl and has a too small water surface, would the Drake be a better choice than the Drake II (the first has a water surface of more than 10 x 8 inches and the second has only 7 x 9).
-do I still need an insulated tank ? (only the model Drake offers it, I think) : I live on a farm and my water comes directly from a big natural source and is very cold. I always had an insulated tank for the toilet.
-I remark that the trap seal of the Drake model is bigger than the one of the Drake II, thow the trap diameter is the same. Does it influence any in the siphonic action ?
If the Drake II is the choice, would you go for the CEFIONTECT ? I ask because I just read an history on the forum where a lady had quite a problem with the gloss lifting.
- since I change my actual 1,28 gpf toilet because it leaves to much strikes in the bowl and has a too small water surface, would the Drake be a better choice than the Drake II (the first has a water surface of more than 10 x 8 inches and the second has only 7 x 9).
-do I still need an insulated tank ? (only the model Drake offers it, I think) : I live on a farm and my water comes directly from a big natural source and is very cold. I always had an insulated tank for the toilet.
-I remark that the trap seal of the Drake model is bigger than the one of the Drake II, thow the trap diameter is the same. Does it influence any in the siphonic action ?
If the Drake II is the choice, would you go for the CEFIONTECT ? I ask because I just read an history on the forum where a lady had quite a problem with the gloss lifting.
Last edited: