PERC study released on drainline carry of solid waste by low-flow toilets

Users who are viewing this thread

stephenk

Member
Messages
53
Reaction score
7
Points
8
Location
Plains
I haven't dug through it yet. It's officially being released tomorrow (the 26th), but it looks like they've already posted it on the website. Hopefully this isn't a repost. I haven't seen anyone else post this, but I may have missed it.

Link to the actual study:
http://www.plumbingefficiencyresear...inline-transport-of-solid-waste-in-buildings/

Press release about it:
http://www.plumbingefficiencyresearchcoalition.org/november-26-2012/
November 26, 2012
Posted on November 23, 2012

Plumbing Efficiency Research Coalition (PERC) Releases Long-Anticipated Results of Drainline Transport Study

Chicago, Ill. (November 26, 2012) — The Plumbing Efficiency Research Coalition (PERC) is pleased to announce that the long-anticipated study, The Drainline Transport of Solid Waste in Buildings, has been released and is now available on the PERC Website: http://www.plumbingefficiencyresearchcoalition.org. The study provides important insights into the performance of building drains and addresses opportunities for future research.

PERC was formed in January 2009 through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to develop research projects that support the development of water efficiency and sustainable plumbing products, systems and practices. Projects are financed through government grants, foundations and private financing. The Coalition is comprised of industry organizations seeking to conduct much-needed research in a number of areas. PERC identified drainline transport as its first research project.

The six members of the coalition are represented by Mary Ann Dickinson, Alliance for Water Efficiency (AWE); Jim Kendzel, American Society of Plumbing Engineers (ASPE), Pete DeMarco, International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO); Jay Peters, International Code Council (ICC); Gerry Kennedy, Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors National Association (PHCC); and Barbara C. Higgens, Plumbing Manufacturers International (PMI).

“It’s critically important that we gain a better understanding of how building drains perform as flows from plumbing fixtures, appliances and commercial equipment are reduced and toilet fixtures become increasingly stressed to singularly transport solid waste to sewers. This study identifies the controllable variables in the building drain system, such as slope, flush volume, toilet paper selection and toilet discharge attributes, and examines their relative significance on performance.†says DeMarco, who acted as the technical director for the study.
 

stephenk

Member
Messages
53
Reaction score
7
Points
8
Location
Plains
It looks like some of this will be no surprise to people who have read a lot on the topic or are knowledgeable in the area. Note, I'm not claiming I am knowledgeable.

Just a couple points I've picked out so far:

Toilet paper performance was a significant variable.

They had issues with 0.8 gpf performance. This is on page 47.
0.8 gpf / 3.0 Lpf flush volume: Observation of waste
movement within the Test Apparatus during the 0.8 gallon
(3.0 L) test runs clearly demonstrated a major difference in
performance when compared to the other volume levels
(1.28 gallons and 1.6 gallons). In five (5) of the sixteen (16)
test runs conducted at the 0.8 gpf / 3.0 Lpf volume, the test
media in the test apparatus compressed together to form
large plugs in the drain line that resulted in full-pipe or near
full-pipe conditions (see Photo 7-D). While these plugs
eventually cleared themselves prior to any water overflows
at the flush stand, the PERC TC still found that this flush
volume created a chaotic, unpredictable condition in 4-inch
pipe to the extent that the data at the 0.8 gpf / 3.0 Lpf
volume was mostly noise and not useable in the statistical
analysis.

They found that 1.28 and 1.6 gpf was sufficient, if the drainline was in good condition. This is on page 48.
1.28 gpf/4.8 Lpf and 1.6 gpf/6.0 Lpf flush volumes- The
1.28 gallon (4.8 L) and 1.6 gallon (6.0 L) volumes resulted in
an orderly and predictable movement in the Test Apparatus
(see Photo 7-E and 7-F). In retrofit applications, it is
suggested that drainlines first be inspected for defects, root
intrusions, sagging or other physical conditions that could
result in clogging with lower flush volumes.
 
Last edited:
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks