We are a family of 9. I have a Pensotti wall hanging propane boiler with two radiant heat loops and one approx. 40 gallon indirect water heater tank.
We could use more hot water. I actually have another brand new tank. I am not sure if I can add the second tank in series or parallel as I am not sure how to ensure each one is heated to 120F and not go too hot either.
I was also thinking of adding a third heat loop for the second indirect tank. One advantage to this idea is I have two separate water supply systems and the whole house is home run plumbed with valves. Which means I can chose the water source for each fixture in the house with just a swap of valves. An advantage to this is if two people are showering with the dishwasher running and one washing machine (we have two) running, I could split it so each tank handle a half of the load. We do get a pressure drop to each fixture when a lot is running.
I don’t need information about whether this is illegal. The bottom line is where I live the public water shuts off about once per month because it is unreliable so I have a well I switch everything over to. I have a manifold for each fixture to run off either source and master valves to swap the whole thing over to either slice at any time. We run the well typically to faucets and city water to showers, toilets, and hot water. If the city would provide reliable water I wouldn’t need to do it this way, but they don’t. Any argument my two water sources is illegal falls on my deaf ears because the city fails to provide a reliable flow of water so I do whatever I want. I am not sure why it is unreliable, but I am about the 10th from last home at the end of the system. Why don’t I just run the well for everything? It is 55 ft deep and does not supply enough volume. I wish it would because it is crystal clear drinking water without a filter on it. I thought about drilling the well deeper, but we risk turning a crystal clear water supply into a regretted mineral filled supply.
I could just buy an 80 gallon indirect tank. But, if I can do this with the tank I already have, it will save money. I can’t figure out if I can add a second tank in line with the one I have in series or parallel. Any reason to avoid just adding another heat loop and doing it that way? A new electronic control to go from two loops to three is not very expensive.
Another option would be to buy another boiler and hook it up. I could put heat loops separate if I want. I could have two separate indirect water systems. This wouldn’t save me any money, but I would have plenty of water and would not have to worry about hot water priority over heat loops in January. Not that I have noticed a priority issue now. I could also plumb them so if one fails I would have the other for everything until the failed unit is repaired.
If I had a second boiler I could also add a heat exchanger to my hot tub. Electricity costs more than propane in Maine. I can’t imagine my current boiler could handle all the load of a hot tub heat exchanger.
Any thoughts?
We could use more hot water. I actually have another brand new tank. I am not sure if I can add the second tank in series or parallel as I am not sure how to ensure each one is heated to 120F and not go too hot either.
I was also thinking of adding a third heat loop for the second indirect tank. One advantage to this idea is I have two separate water supply systems and the whole house is home run plumbed with valves. Which means I can chose the water source for each fixture in the house with just a swap of valves. An advantage to this is if two people are showering with the dishwasher running and one washing machine (we have two) running, I could split it so each tank handle a half of the load. We do get a pressure drop to each fixture when a lot is running.
I don’t need information about whether this is illegal. The bottom line is where I live the public water shuts off about once per month because it is unreliable so I have a well I switch everything over to. I have a manifold for each fixture to run off either source and master valves to swap the whole thing over to either slice at any time. We run the well typically to faucets and city water to showers, toilets, and hot water. If the city would provide reliable water I wouldn’t need to do it this way, but they don’t. Any argument my two water sources is illegal falls on my deaf ears because the city fails to provide a reliable flow of water so I do whatever I want. I am not sure why it is unreliable, but I am about the 10th from last home at the end of the system. Why don’t I just run the well for everything? It is 55 ft deep and does not supply enough volume. I wish it would because it is crystal clear drinking water without a filter on it. I thought about drilling the well deeper, but we risk turning a crystal clear water supply into a regretted mineral filled supply.
I could just buy an 80 gallon indirect tank. But, if I can do this with the tank I already have, it will save money. I can’t figure out if I can add a second tank in line with the one I have in series or parallel. Any reason to avoid just adding another heat loop and doing it that way? A new electronic control to go from two loops to three is not very expensive.
Another option would be to buy another boiler and hook it up. I could put heat loops separate if I want. I could have two separate indirect water systems. This wouldn’t save me any money, but I would have plenty of water and would not have to worry about hot water priority over heat loops in January. Not that I have noticed a priority issue now. I could also plumb them so if one fails I would have the other for everything until the failed unit is repaired.
If I had a second boiler I could also add a heat exchanger to my hot tub. Electricity costs more than propane in Maine. I can’t imagine my current boiler could handle all the load of a hot tub heat exchanger.
Any thoughts?
Last edited: