Flushing issues with rear discharge power flush toilets

Users who are viewing this thread

Marie Shively

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
South Padre Island, TX
We live in a condo with cement floors so they built the bathrooms with Kohler rear discharge power flush toilets, model # M-101526-F4 with a Sloan Flushmate system. The plumber says there is a T that connects the common plumbing wasteline between the two bathrooms. The toilets are directly back to back on the common wall.

The issue we are having is that when someone uses the bathroom and has a bowel movement, the flushing action moves some of the waste into the other toilet and we end up having to flush both toilets. This happens almost every time. We had a plumber in yesterday and he checked to see if there was any type of obstruction in the line and there wasn't.

He has said the only thing he thinks we could do is to build out the wall about 6 inches on each side to accommodate a Y fitting instead of the T fitting. The bathrooms are really small and adding 6 inches to the depth of the toilet area would drop the space between the wall and the toilet down to about 22 inches.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,863
Reaction score
4,430
Points
113
Location
IL
He has said the only thing he thinks we could do is to build out the wall about 6 inches on each side to accommodate a Y fitting instead of the T fitting. The bathrooms are really small and adding 6 inches to the depth of the toilet area would drop the space between the wall and the toilet down to about 22 inches.

I am not a plumber. I suspect he might have meant that the wall would have to be built out to some lesser amount. 22 inches does seem excessive.

What I suggest is that you post a sketch of what you think is in the wall, and on the wall, now, and see what solution is suggested.

Also, how far does the bowl currently extend from the wall, and is it round or elongated?

Is the solution, if successful on the initial build, probably going to be duplicated several times?
 

Marie Shively

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
South Padre Island, TX
I am not a plumber. I suspect he might have meant that the wall would have to be built out to some lesser amount. 22 inches does seem excessive.

What I suggest is that you post a sketch of what you think is in the wall, and on the wall, now, and see what solution is suggested.

Also, how far does the bowl currently extend from the wall, and is it round or elongated?

Is the solution, if successful on the initial build, probably going to be duplicated several times?


I think I might have confused you. The 22 inches would be from the wall across from the toilet to the front edge of the toilet. Unfortunately this is an old condo and they claim we are the only ones with an issue.
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,863
Reaction score
4,430
Points
113
Location
IL
I think I might have confused you.
Un-confuse us.

Are you saying 6+6+6=18, or what? It is better to say what you have than what you don't have.

Also, have you asked other occupants, or is the board actually saying that you and your neighbor are the only two who have complained?
 

Marie Shively

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
South Padre Island, TX
I've done a drawing showing the current measurements. The 27.5 clearance would go down to about 21.5.
 

Attachments

  • Toilet diagram.jpg
    Toilet diagram.jpg
    52.4 KB · Views: 287

Marie Shively

New Member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
South Padre Island, TX
The condo is in a condotel (rented out as hotel when we aren't using it). We are going to ask the association why these were installed and determine if it is a requirement. Thanks for your input.
 

Jadnashua

Retired Defense Industry Engineer xxx
Messages
32,770
Reaction score
1,190
Points
113
Location
New England
Back-to-back toilet installations never should have been installed with a T. That offers no resistance from one toilet to the other. The installation instructions on most toilets (at least that I've seen) specifically say to use a Y connection to avoid that specific problem. To get a Y, without offsetting the toilets some so that the arms can be within the existing wall space, would mean the toilets would need to be further apart.
 

WJcandee

Wise One
Messages
3,181
Reaction score
170
Points
63
Location
New York, NY
I think I might have confused you. The 22 inches would be from the wall across from the toilet to the front edge of the toilet. Unfortunately this is an old condo and they claim we are the only ones with an issue.

Yeah, if all the units have the Flushmate mounted on a T, you're not the only one with a problem. My educated wild guess, if these are indeed old condos, is that the units were initially built with 3-or-5-gallon gravity-flush rear-discharge toilets connecting to a T, and the previous owner in the unit replaced them with the 1.6 gallon-per-flush Flushmate-equipped Kohlers. Or, it initially had been equipped with poor-performing low-flow rear-discharge toilets which the previous owner replaced with the Flushmate-equipped Kohlers to get more oomph -- right into the other toilet. Probably cheaper and easier to replace with good gravity toilets like the ones that Terry recommends than to do a bunch of plumbing -- even if the gravity ones also should be installed to a Y. You still might get a little siphoning or flickering of the water across the way, but you shouldn't end up with actual waste (yecch) propagating into the other toilet.
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks