Dusty Fellow
New Member
Just curious which would be considered preferred practice for 2” CI DWV rough-in for lavs: the tapped 1.5” santee or plain no-hub?
Pros and cons either way?
Pros and cons either way?
You're going to be stubbing out with the 1-1/2" pipe nipple right?
P-trap attaches with a slip joint nut.
It would be dependant upon the location of the sanitary tee; is it direclty behind the sink outlet or is is it further away to either side as to go around a window?Just curious which would be considered preferred practice for 2” CI DWV rough-in for lavs: the tapped 1.5” santee or plain no-hub?
Pros and cons either way?
It would be dependant upon the location of the sanitary tee; is it direclty behind the sink outlet or is is it further away to either side as to go around a window?
Too many variables in your generic question, would need more details for proper answer.
Whoa... good point.. list says 1.5 inch schedule 80 ID is 1.500 inch.the sch 80 nipple might not allow a tubular trap to slip inside not sure .
Whoa... good point.. list says 1.5 inch schedule 80 ID is 1.500
The other fitting You show we call a desanco (brand) is preferred connection I've been told putting a tubular trap on a standard nipple isn't correct , and many new con jobs require us to use that trap adapter.
This is awkward, but...
It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.
If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.