Aquia I vs. Aquia II MaP tests

Users who are viewing this thread

Randm

New Member
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
San Bruno, CA
I downloaded a chart from San Francisco Public Utilities (SFPUC) and they have listed the Aquia EL with an 800 MaP score and they have the Aquia EL II and III listed with a 500 MaP score.

My questions is what is the difference between the Aquia and the Aquia II that would change the score so much?

Is the Aquia more effecient than the II?

Thanks
 

Terry

The Plumbing Wizard
Staff member
Messages
29,946
Reaction score
3,460
Points
113
Location
Bothell, Washington
Website
terrylove.com
aquia_adapter.jpg

The Aquia I, has the larger trapway.
The II and the III use the internal trapway and only a flange adapter at the floor.
500 grams is fine, most feel that anything over 500 is overkill anyway.
 

Randm

New Member
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
San Bruno, CA
Thanks Terry,

I'm one of those guys who try to get the most bang for their buck. so to speak.
I was concerned about the MaP numbers. I you say 500 is fine then I'll trust that. I suppose anything will be better than my old 3.6g toilet.

I never would have thought that I'd be so excited about getting a toilet. I guess it shows my age or it shows what I put a premium value on. LOL. :eek:
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks