Sink drain and vent remode

Users who are viewing this thread

JRLND

New Member
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Bismarck, North Dakota
See attached photo. I am redoing the rough in for my sink plumbing. I currently have 1 lab and am switching to 2. I need help on how to properly set drains and vents to meet code.

88B241B1-8099-4109-9329-77894C069440.jpeg
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,858
Reaction score
4,428
Points
113
Location
IL
ND is UPC.

You are only adding one lavatory,

Let's see what is going on at the right end of that horizontal pipe, on the other side of the toilet.
 

wwhitney

In the Trades
Messages
6,557
Reaction score
1,841
Points
113
Location
Berkeley, CA
That connectivity works as a horizontal wet vent under the UPC if the pipe from the right lav connection to the stack is 2". The UPC only allows 1 DFU on a 1-1/2" horizontal drain.

https://up.codes/viewer/north_dakota/upc-2018/chapter/7/sanitary-drainage#703.2

Fittings-wise, the left lav needs a LT90 to turn into the wall, and the right lav needs a horizontal combo (2x1-1/2x1-1/2) where the drains join. The vertical vent takeoff needs to be an upright 1-1/2" combo.

Cheers, Wayne
 

wwhitney

In the Trades
Messages
6,557
Reaction score
1,841
Points
113
Location
Berkeley, CA
The left needs a long turn, but the right lav just a combo?
A quarter bend and a san-tee (what you linked to) have the same curvature. That curvature is enough for a drain turning from horizontal to vertical. So the san-tee can only be used for drainage with the barrel vertical.

For horizontal to horizontal drainage turns, you need more curvature. That's provided by using two 45s, or equivalently a long turn 90. Likewise by using a wye fitting plus a 45, or equivalently a combo.

The extra curvature is also required when a drain turns from vertical to horizontal. The UPC requires the vent takeoff to be plumbed like a drain in case it ever fills from a blockage. So your vent take off needs to be an upright wye plus 45, or a combo.

Cheers, Wayne
 

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,858
Reaction score
4,428
Points
113
Location
IL

JRLND

New Member
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Bismarck, North Dakota
Awesome. I have the final design done now, thanks. Only issue is splicing in to the main-vertical 3” vent/drain. I have wyes for it, but won’t be able to make the connections due to limited movement of pipe and all of the other connections. Can I use a rubber coupling? I bought 2. See attached. I can not find that in the UPC.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    75.1 KB · Views: 140
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    73 KB · Views: 134

Reach4

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,858
Reaction score
4,428
Points
113
Location
IL
Can I use a rubber coupling? I bought 2. See attached. I can not find that in the UPC.
You can use the one with the stainless steel band (P3000-33). The band can be slid away as you get the rubber into position. Liquid dish detergent is often used as a lube for the rubber.

Often you will need two (to insert a segment), and sometimes you can get by with one.
 

wwhitney

In the Trades
Messages
6,557
Reaction score
1,841
Points
113
Location
Berkeley, CA
You can use a shielded rubber coupling. For 3" plastic to 3" plastic, it would be Fernco 3005-33 or Mission P-300. The requirement is ASTM C1460, and the reference is here:

https://up.codes/viewer/north_dakota/upc-2018/chapter/7/sanitary-drainage#705.10

Note that does say "different materials" but I understand that's routinely ignored and use for connecting the same material. It's also a bit silly, as you could do your new work in PVC and cut it into the existing ABS and it would certainly comply. But then whether your new work is PVC or ABS should have no bearing on the acceptability of the end result.

Cheers, Wayne

Edit PS I think the first sentence of 705.1.1 also allows a shielded coupling without specifying the necessary ASTM compliance. The next sentence in reference to ASTM D3212 is only for push-on joints. Which I understand to be something like a gasketed bell end of a sewer pipe.

https://up.codes/viewer/north_dakota/upc-2018/chapter/7/sanitary-drainage#705.1.1
 

JRLND

New Member
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Bismarck, North Dakota
Thanks for all of the help. I sure hope this is legal. Here’s a pic
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    89.7 KB · Views: 147
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    86.7 KB · Views: 134

wwhitney

In the Trades
Messages
6,557
Reaction score
1,841
Points
113
Location
Berkeley, CA
Looks good to me, as long as the lower san-tee in the second picture is at least 6" above the vanity sink rim.

I think technically the 1-1/2" to 2" transition should have occurred between the vent combo and the combo for the right hand sink. The UPC calls for the trap arm to be the same size as the fixture trap (although that's routinely violated for a 1-1/4" sink trap on a 1-1/2" trap arm). And the trap arm extends up to the vent takeoff, which is the vent combo. But I don't think enlarging it earlier like you have is an actual problem.

Cheers, Wayne
 

JRLND

New Member
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Bismarck, North Dakota
Ahhh crap.....luckily it's not a terrible fix to cut out and move that transition, but I think I'll leave it and see if he gives me a hard time.

Counter top (flood rim) to bottom of san-tee pipe is 5"...my new vanity is 35" top of counter, which must have been taller than the old...I can't remember. Splicing in to the vent stack was a pain, so I'm going to go with it. Worse case I'll have to drop the vanity design down to 34".

Big thanks for the responses. You've been a huge help.
 
Top
Hey, wait a minute.

This is awkward, but...

It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.

If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.
I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks