Ok guys! Play nice please! Anyway, Thanks for the Info SaveGreen.. Interesting that you mention the Save-A-Buck site -- something I'd never heard of.. If I go to my own water companies website (calwater.com), they don't mention this at all unless it's buried really well.. I figured if it wasn't on their site then there wasn't one.. Anyway, I dropped a note to the Save-a-buck people just to be sure my city qualifies which I *think* it does -- just to be on the safe side before I pony up $$ for something that could be out of my own pocket.
Anyway, in doing more research on the Rainbird ET hardware -- it looks nice, but it looks like you must use it with a regular controller (such as my non-ET SmartLine).. Too bad you can't use it directly w/o another existing controller -- that seems like a good way to increase installation costs if you've got to replace an crappy older controller anyway. I'll have to dig through the docs to see if this is completely true or not..
One other issue with this service is that the local weather station nearest me is >60 miles away (in Camarillo,CA) -- certainly not the most optimal setup in my opinion, but the climate
should be similar since they're an ocean town as we are.. I guess I could setup my own weather station and get connected to the Rainbird infrastructure to be a closer-locality if anyone else nearby was using another ET controller.. Not sure how that works other than using some sort of internet connected software..
Anyway.. Since I can get at most $630 in refunds for the controller (for a single irrigated ACRE) -- what's the chance that the $630 is reduced by X for smaller parcels? My entire lot is ~8000SF and if I divide 630/43560 (1acre), the rebate is only ~$116 -- not much off that $700 controller (particularly when you figure that my house is taking up ~50% of that lot size reducing the rebate by even more -- to perhaps $60 for the controller only)..
I guess what you're really getting at is that the cost of the controller shouldn't matter since it's about saving $$ through extended use over time (similar to payback from installing Solar panels -- sure the upfront costs are $$$$, but the payback is over many years in lower electric bills) -- correct?
Anyway, let me know if you know the answer to the last question.. That's the kicker for me.. If they'll still give me $630 in rebates for my much-smaller-than-1-acre yard, then I'm probably in.. However the wording in the rebate application isn't very favorable :
Rebates will be paid based on the size of the area being irrigated by the controller(s) or by the number of Rotating Nozzles installed or by the number of Large Rotary Sprinkler retrofits installed. To qualify for this program, you must accurately indicate the irrigated area on the application.
I'll have to admit that as a computer geek by trade, I like the idea of being able to analyze this thing better than most other controllers out there.. I can tell that some thought was put into the design.. Too bad it can't get the data off the internet via WIFI.. Oh well.. Perhaps for the next version..