Re: Shared Trap

Posted by Daryle Tilroe on April 25, 2004 at 22:30:03:
In response to Re: Shared Trap
: : I don't immediatly see what would cause the sink to drain slowly simply due to the length of that run. Could you explain what I am missing? : Let's rediscover the fool issue... Ignoring the flamebait this time... Let me rephrase it: Given that a code drain would follow the identical path (or in other words assume that the orginial proposal met wet stack distance requirements), plus have a trap inline under the sink, why would it drain slower? If the run was beyond code of course it might drain slower and be at risk of siphoning out a sink trap.

Posted by Daryle Tilroe on April 25, 2004 at 22:30:03:

In response to Re: Shared Trap

: : I don't immediatly see what would cause the sink to drain slowly simply due to the length of that run. Could you explain what I am missing?

: Let's rediscover the fool issue...

Ignoring the flamebait this time...

Let me rephrase it: Given that a code drain would follow the identical path (or in other words assume that the orginial proposal met wet stack distance requirements), plus have a trap inline under the sink, why would it drain slower? If the run was beyond code of course it might drain slower and be at risk of siphoning out a sink trap.

Replies to this post

Let me offer a hint: VENT jimbo 15:36:10 04/26/04(0)
Re: Shared Trap Gary Swart 00:25:26 04/26/04(7)
- Re: Shared Trap ED 19:01:28 04/26/04(5)
  - Re: Shared Trap Gary Swart 20:57:50 04/26/04(4)
    - Re: Shared Trap Daryle Tilroe 23:09:13 04/26/04(1)
    - Re: Shared Trap Daryle Tilroe 23:08:42 04/26/04(1)
      - OK, let's all take a deep breath.... jimbo 09:41:43 04/27/04(0)