# 2008 nec question.

Discussion in 'Electrical Forum discussion & Blog' started by tig welder, May 9, 2009.

1. ### tig welderNew Member

Joined:
Mar 6, 2007
in january i was promoted to a apprentice election and i am in my 2nd class residential wiring 2 at the school.my work started me late ( with the school class schedule) so i missed the code book class and i will take it in the fall.

i have been tring to understand the code book by looking up codes and thinking of questions and finding the answers and i found a question that i can not find the answer that was given to me in school.

#1. i am told by everyone that you can not put romex in coduit for a continous run,because of heat and #2. you can not put 1 raceway inside of another . ( i can not find these 2 things spelled out in the nec book)

i found you can run it inside conduit for protection of nonmetallic cable in a basement. nec 300.15(c) nec 334.15(b)
i know i have missed something

i want to understand how i should be reading or understanding what i have read to make it make sence . if that makes sence .

any help would be greatly appreciated

Last edited: May 9, 2009
2. ### ThatguyHomeowner

Joined:
Aug 27, 2008
Occupation:
A bounty hunter like in "Raising Arizona"
Location:
MD
My 2Â¢

50' of #14 AWG copper Romex carrying 15A will dissipate 59w, about 1.1w/ft. With a straight wire in free air this is not a problem.

Temp. rise due to heat dissipation from Romex inside a conduit can be pretty messy to calculate.

Beyond reverse engineering this
http://www.jhlarson.com/ind_tables/conductor/table310-16.htm
I'm pretty much stuck, and this is with two degrees in EE.

The NEC is probably the results of lab measurements, elec. theory, predictable heat loss by conduction and convection, calculations, prediction and observation of human behavior, electrocutions, explosions and fires. So far I haven't done the last three but I did melt a wall outlet timer (due to high contact impedance due to the timer being half out of the wall socket).

Last edited: May 9, 2009

4. ### tig welderNew Member

Joined:
Mar 6, 2007
hi thatguy.
i have been looking at the n.e.c. book hard since tuesday.
a teacher told me to look at 310.8 (a)(b)(c) and table 310.13(a).
the table is like the one you posted. but i am not seeing how these get me to my answer.
you and a teacher showed about the same table that tells me something is there.
i keep reading 310.10 temperature limitation of conductors which says to see table 310.13 (a) & (c). but i can not put everything together yet.
thank you for your help.

5. ### Speedy PeteyLicensed Electrical Contractor

Joined:
Jun 16, 2007
Occupation:
Location:
NY State, USA
There is nothing that expressly forbids, or allows, NM cable in a conduit system, as long as conductor fill is met.

The old "You can't put a raceway/cable in a raceway" myth is just that, a myth.

I will say one thing for sure, it is NOT done by any professional that I know of. It is simply bad practice.

6. ### AlectricianDIY Senior Member

Joined:
Jun 15, 2007
I have done commercial renovation where we pulled MC cable thru existing EMT which was installed in a 12th story floor. It was easier than setting extra boxes and adapting to MC for the rest of the circuit. I didn't see anything wrong with it.

7. ### Speedy PeteyLicensed Electrical Contractor

Joined:
Jun 16, 2007
Occupation:
Location:
NY State, USA
A situation like that is understandable.

I am talking about running NM cable in conduit when other options (IE: doing it the right way) are available.

8. ### ThatguyHomeowner

Joined:
Aug 27, 2008
Occupation:
A bounty hunter like in "Raising Arizona"
Location:
MD
I have to defer to the electricians on this site, but if you can post links to the these two tables I'll take a whack at them. I only have the '99 NEC paper copy.

The table I posted relates ampacity to conductor size to insulation type. Since heating is proportional to IÂ²R, the temp. rise above ambient is proportional to IÂ²R. It helps if you add a column to the table showing resistance of each AWG size.
#14 copper is ~2.6 milliohms/ft, and #12 is 1.6, and resistance halves for each 3 increasing gauge numbers.

Heat loss is by conduction, convection and radiation. At these temps. heat loss by radiation is probably negligible, which leaves conduction and convection.
If heat in is more than heat out, the temp. will rise until heat in does equal heat out. Hopefully this final temp. is within the temp. rating of the wire insulation.

Last edited: May 10, 2009
9. ### Billy_BobIn the Trades

Joined:
Apr 2, 2008
Might try searching googe.com for the words...

2008 nec 310.8 table

or

nec 310.8 table

10. ### ThatguyHomeowner

Joined:
Aug 27, 2008
Occupation:
A bounty hunter like in "Raising Arizona"
Location:
MD
Last edited: May 10, 2009
Similar Threads: 2008 question
Forum Title Date
Electrical Forum discussion & Blog 2008 NEC/ Closet Lights Jan 14, 2011
Electrical Forum discussion & Blog online NEC 2008: a printing tip May 21, 2010
Electrical Forum discussion & Blog Anyone know if there are new ARC FAULT requirements in NEC 2008? Dec 24, 2007
Electrical Forum discussion & Blog The new 2008 nec. Sep 26, 2007
Electrical Forum discussion & Blog Question about tamper-resistant outlets Jan 9, 2016