Molo
Member
I've heard there are reasons not to reduce the output of a furnace by eliminating burners (going from a 100btu down to a 35btu). What are the reasons not to do this?
Thanks,
Bill
Thanks,
Bill
las time I changed an orifice (jet) was when I experimented running my 58 Ford pickup on 100% Ethanol in the late 70'sIt would be easier to change the orifice, and hope it don't blow.
Bad Idea.
las time I changed an orifice (jet) was when I experimented running my 58 Ford pickup on 100% Ethanol in the late 70's
I've heard there are reasons not to reduce the output of a furnace by eliminating burners (going from a 100btu down to a 35btu). What are the reasons not to do this?
Thanks,
Bill
Actually, it ran pretty well once it warmed up, which took a while, even in nice weather. I did not run it long enough to damage any valves. Used about 15 gallons of Ethanol in total during my experiments.I hope you added some Lube with that Ethanol, Sounds like it ran fast for a short period of time. lol
Actually, it ran pretty well once it warmed up, which took a while, even in nice weather. I did not run it long enough to damage any valves. Used about 15 gallons of Ethanol in total during my experiments.
Brrrp, you got me pegged.Man, That is a lot of drinking. lol
I've heard there are reasons not to reduce the output of a furnace by eliminating burners (going from a 100btu down to a 35btu). What are the reasons not to do this?
Thanks,
Bill
This is awkward, but...
It looks like you're using an ad blocker. We get it, but (1) terrylove.com can't live without ads, and (2) ad blockers can cause issues with videos and comments. If you'd like to support the site, please allow ads.
If any particular ad is your REASON for blocking ads, please let us know. We might be able to do something about it. Thanks.